Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2233-4165(Print)
ISSN : 2233-5382(Online)
Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business Vol.8 No.6 pp.41-49
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2017.vol8.no6.41.

Differences in Perceived Risk and Product Attitudes : Focus on Korea and Thailand Consumers

Moon-Jung Kim*, Eun-Hee Kim**
*First Author, Professor, Dept. of Advertising Marketing, Baeksoek Culture University, Korea. Tel: +82-41-550-0421, E-mail: hasarang@bscu.ac.kr
**Corresponding Author, Assistant Professor, Dept. of Advertising & Public Relations & Journalism, Mokwon University, Korea. Tel: +82-42-829-7787, E-mail: eunhee0103@mokwon.ac.kr
October 17, 2017. November 15, 2017. November 15, 2017.

Abstract

Purpose – The purpose of this research is to examine the differences and interaction effects of perceived risk and product attitudes between Korea and Thailand consumers in accordance with price discount and product types.
Research design, data, and methodology – A questionnaire survey was conducted in Korea and Thailand. There were a total of 327questionnaires received, and 322 of them were valid. Respondents consisted of 163 Koreans and 159 Thai consumers. Each question is measured in a Likert-type five-point scale. To verify the difference and interaction effects of perceived risk and product attitudes, ANOVA analysis was carried out.
Results – This research found that the perceived risk of Thailand consumers in accordance with price discount and product types is confirmed to be larger than Korean consumers. The difference of product attitudes of Thailand consumers is higher than those of Korean consumers. Thus, product attitudes in accordance with country type and price discount types are verified with the interaction effect. The difference of product attitudes in accordance with price discount type and product types are not founded. The main effect was not verified.
Conclusions – The finding of this study can be used as useful information to Korean and Thai retailers looking to enter the global market.

JEL Classifications: L81, M16, M31.

초록


 

Figure

Table

Reference

  1. Adams, W. J., & Yellen, J. L. (1976). Commodity Bundling and the Burden of Monopoly. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 90(3), 475-498.
  2. Aghion, P., & Bolton, P. (1987). Contracts as A Barrier to Entry. American Economic Review, 77(3), 388-401.
  3. Ansari, Asim, Siddarth, S., & Weinberg, C. B. (1996). Pricing a Bundle of Products or Services: The Case of Nonprofits. Journal of Marketing Research, 33(1), 86–93.
  4. Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1999). Bundling Information Goods: Pricing, Profits and Efficiency, Management Science, 45(12), 1613–30.
  5. Bakos, Y., & Brynjolfsson, E. (2000). Bundling and Competition on the Internet. Marketing Science, 19(1), 63–82.
  6. Bauer, R. (1960). Consumer behavior as risk taking. In R. Hancock (Ed.), Dynamic marketing for a changing world: Proceedings of 43rd Conference, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, (pp. 389-398). Science, 19(1), 63-82.
  7. Bernheim, B., Skinner, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). What Accounts for The Variation in Retirement Wealth Among U.S. Households?. American Economic Review, 91, 832-857.
  8. Bettman, J. (1973). Perceived Risk and its Components: A Model and Empirical Test. Journal of Marketing Research, 10, 184-189.
  9. Ben-Akiva, M., & Gershenfeld, S. (1998). Multi-featured Products and Services: Annualizing Pricing and Bundling Strategies. Journal of Forecasting, 17(3–4), 175–96.
  10. Beneke, J., Greene, A., Lok, I., & Mallett, K. (2012). The Influence of Perceived Risk on Purchase Intent: The Case of Premium Grocery Private Label Brands in South Africa. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 21(1), 4-14. doi:10.1108/10610421211203060
  11. Bork, R. (1978). The Antitrust Paradox. New York: Free Press. Economides, N. 2009. Loyalty/Requirement Rebates and The Antitrust Modernization Commission: What is the Appropriate Liability Standard?. Antitrust Bulletin, 54, 259.
  12. Carbajo, J., Meza, D., & Seidman, D. J. (1990). A Strategic Motivation for Commodity Bundling. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 38(March), 283–298.
  13. Chaudhuri, A. (1997). Consumption Emotion and Perceived Risk: A Macro-Analytic Approach. Journal of Business Research, 39, 81-92.
  14. Chen, Y. M. (1997). Equilibrium Product Bundling, Journal of Business, 70(1), 85–103.
  15. Chen, Z., & Dubinsky, A. (2003). A Conceptual Model of Perceived Customer Value in E-Commerce: A Preliminary Investigation. Psychology and Marketing, 20(4), 323-347.
  16. Churchill, G. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26, 64-73.
  17. Coltman, T., Devinney, T., Latukefu, A., & Midgley, D. (2001). E-business: Revolution, Evolution or Hype?. California Management Review, 44(1), 57-85.
  18. Cox, D. F. (1967). Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior. Boston: Harvard University.
  19. Cunningham, L., Gerlach, J., Harper, M., & Young, C. (2005). Perceived Risk and The Consumer Buying Process: Internet Airline Reservations. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(4), 357-372.
  20. Economides, N. (2012). Tying, Bundling, and Loyalty/ Requirement Rebates. In Research Handbook on the Economics of Antitrust Law. London: Edward Elgar.
  21. Eppen, G., Ward, D., Hanson, A., & Martin, R. K. (1991). Bundling—New Products, New Markets, Low Risk. Sloan Management Review, 32(Summer), 7–14.
  22. Evans, D., & Salinger, M. A. (2005). Why Do Firms Bundle and Tie? Evidence from Competitive Markets and Implications for Tying Law. Yale Journal on Regulation, 22, 37-89.
  23. Evans, M., Jamal, A., & Foxall, G. (2010). Consumer behaviour (2nd ed.). UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  24. Guerrero, L., Colomer, Y., Guárdia, M. D., Xicola, J., & Clotet, R. (2000). Consumer attitude towards store brands, food quality and preference. Food Quality and reference, 11(5), 387-395. doi:10.1016/S0950-3293(00)00012-4
  25. Guiltinan, J. P. (1987). The Price Bundling of Services: A Normative Framework. Journal of Marketing, 51 (April), 74–85.
  26. Gwon, J. H. (2015). A Strategic Effect of Bundling on Product Distribution. Journal of Distribution, 13(10), 15-21.
  27. Jacoby, J., & Kaplan, L. B. (1972). The components of perceived risk. Paper presented at the Third Annual Conference of Association for Consumer Research, College Park.
  28. Johnson, M. D., Herrmann, A., & Bauer, H. H. (1999). The Effects of Price Bundling on Consumer Evaluations of Product Offerings. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(2), 129–42.
  29. Kang, Y. H., & Kim, J. H. (2012). Preference Reversals in Bundle Product Depending on Reference Point: Focus Effect Through Reference Point and Discounted Price Presentation. Journal of Consumer Studies, 23(2), 1-22.
  30. Kaplan, L. B., Szybillo, G. J., & Jacoby, J. (1974). Components of Perceive Risk in Product Purchase: A Cross-validation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(3), 287-291.
  31. Kyung, H. B., & Seong, K. Y. (2010). The Bundling Strategy in a Different Market Condition. The Journal of Women & Management, 2(2), 1-17.
  32. Lee, J. M., Park, D. H., & Han, I. G. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7, 341–352.
  33. Mackenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). Empirical examination of Structural Antecedents of Attitude Toward in the Advertising Pretesting Context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48-65.
  34. Martin, S. (1999). Strategic and Welfare Implications of Bundling. Economics Letters, 62(3), 371–76.
  35. Matutes, C., & Regibeau, P. (1992). Compatibility and Bundling of Complementary Goods in a Duopoly. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 25(March), 37–54.
  36. Mitchell, V. (1999). Consumer Perceived Risk: Conceptualizations and Models. European Journal of Marketing, 33(1/2), 163-195.
  37. Miyazaki, A., & Fernandez, A. (2001). Consumer perceptions of privacy and security risks for online shopping. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 27-44.
  38. Mulhern, F. J., & Leone, R. P. (1991). Implicit Price Bundling of Retail Products: A Multiproduct Approach to Maximizing Store Profitability. Journal of Marketing, 55(October), 63–76.
  39. Murray, K., & Schlater, J. (1990). The Impact of Services Versus Goods on Consumers’ assessment of perceived risk. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 18(1), 51-65.
  40. Murray, K. (1991). A Test of Service Marketing Theory: Consumer Information Acquisition activities. Journal of Marketing, 55, 10-25.
  41. Park, S. J. (2011). The Effect of Bundle Price Discount Framing on Consumers' Review. Korea association of business education, 26(2), 223-241.
  42. Schiffman, G. L., & Kanuk, L. L. (2010). Consumer behavior (10th ed.). NJ: Prentice Hall.
  43. Stone, R. N., & Gronhaug, K. (1993). Perceived Risk: Further Considerations for the Marketing Discipline. European Journal of Marketing, 27(3), 39-50.
  44. Tan, S. (1999). Strategies for reducing consumer's risk aversion in Internet shopping. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 16(2), 163-180.
  45. Arslan, Y., Geçti, F., & Zengin, H. (2013). Examining Perceived Risk and Its Influence on Attitudes: A Study on Private Label Consumers in Turkey. Asian Social Science, 9(4), 158-166.
  46. Zeithaml, V., & Bitner, M. (2003) Service Marketing: Integrating Customer Focus across the Firm. New York: McGraw-Hill.