Journal Search Engine
Search Advanced Search Adode Reader(link)
Download PDF Export Citaion korean bibliography PMC previewer
ISSN : 2233-4165(Print)
ISSN : 2233-5382(Online)
Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business Vol.9 No.11 pp.93-104
DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13106/ijidb.2018.vol9.no11.93.

Effects of SM-sized Manufacturing Firm Management Performance: Control Effect of CEO Characteristics and Mediating Effect of Core Competence

Young-Dong Roh*,Sang-Beom Park**
* First Author, Ph.D student, School of Business Administration, Korea Aerospace University, Korea, E-mail: balhae22@naver.com
** Corresponding Author, Professor, School of Business Administration, Korea Aerospace University, Korea. Tel: +82-2-300-0352, E-mail: psb@kau.ac.kr
October 15, 2018. November 04, 2018. November 04, 2018.

Abstract

Purpose – For small and medium sized firms, CEO characteristics are main factor influencing firms’ prosperity as well as performance. So it is quite natural that many people are interested in factors of CEO that matters. In this research, CEO characteristics in terms of capabilities and skill or special knowledge necessary to run the business are invested for manufacturing firms. Precedent studies reveal that CEO characteristics such as psychological factors including desire to succeed, tendency to take risks, personal factors including age, year of running business, and task related factors including managing capability, communication skills, network influence firm performance for manufacturing firms. However, these studies simply verify whether or not those factors affect firm’s managing performance. This study, however, goes further to investigate how is the affecting process from CEO’s capabilities and organization characteristics to firm’s core competence, and from core competence to advantages, and from advantages to managing performance.
Research design, data, and methodology – We make a questionnaire and surveyed manufacturing firm CEO’s in Gyeonggi-do area. General characteristics analysis, factor analysis, regression analysis, and control effect analysis was conducted. SPSS 2.0 Win, version was used.
Results – The CEO characteristics including basic capability, task capability, leadership, and organization characteristics affect core competence at the statistically significant level. And, core competence affect both price advantage and differentiation advantage at the significant level. Some unique finding is that while differentiation advantage affects both financial achievement and non-financial achievement, price advantage does not affect both financial and non-financial achievement. And firm characteristics mainly measured by CEO characteristics of skills has control effects on the trace from core competence to price advantage.
Conclusions – For small and medium sized firms CEO characteristics is the most important factor influencing firm’s prosperity. For manufacturing firms, whether CEO has the skill or special knowledge to run the firm is critical factor. The study results show that CEO’s for manufacturing firms put importance on price and price advantage which seems to be familiar to them. However, the price advantage does not influential to financial and non-financial achievement. This result suggests that small and medium sized manufacturing firms’ CEO’s should make effort to improve other aspects of advantages to be more competitive.

JEL Classifications: D21, L23, L60, L89, M14.

중소 제조기업의 경영 성과에 미치는 영향: 경영자특성의 조절효과와 핵심역량의 매개효과

노영동,박상범

초록


    Figure

    Table

    Reference

    1. Barton, Leonard, D. (1992). Core capabilities and core rigidities: A paradox in managing new product development. Strategic management journal, 13(S1), 111-125.
    2. Beard, D. W., & Dess, G. G. (1981). Corporate-level strategy, business-level strategy, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 663-688.
    3. Chang, S. J. (2007). Global Strategic Management in the age of global competition. Pakyoung Publishing co.
    4. Choi, B. G. (2008). Managing Firm Resources to Create Value: Based on ERP Implementation, Information Systems Review, 10(3), 111-132.
    5. Choi, K. K., & Kim, S. K. (2005). The Effect on the Job Performance of the ERP Introduction in SMEs. Small and medium-sized research, 27(4), 29-53.
    6. Choo, S. Y., Yoo, J. M., & Lim, S. J. (2009). A Study on the Effects of the Fit among Environment, Strategy and Competence on Firm Performance. Strategic Management Research, 12(1): 101-126.
    7. Collis, D. J., & Montgomery C. 1995. Competing on resources: strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118–128.
    8. Conant, J. S., Mokwa, M. P., & Varadarajan, P. R. (1990). Strategic types, distinctive marketing competencies and organizational performance: A multiple measures-based study. Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), 365-383.
    9. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). ASSET STOCK ACCUMULATION AND THE SUSTAINABILITY OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE: REPLY. Management Science, 35(12).
    10. Ghemawat, P. (2009). Strategy and the Business Landscape. New York: Prentice Hall.
    11. Goo, J. D. (2009). A Study on the Relationship among Core Competence, Non-Financial and Financial Management Performances of Hotel Industry. International Journal of Tourism Management and Sciences, 23(4): 259-277.
    12. Grant, R. M. (1991). The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation. California Management Review, 33(3), 114-135.
    13. Gupta, A. K. (1987). SBU strategies, Corporate-SBU Relations, and SBU Effectiveness in Strategy Implementation. The Academy of Management Journal, 30(3), 477-500.
    14. Gwak, G. Y., Choi, J. S., & Baek, G. B. (2016). The Moderating Effect of CEO Competency in the Relations between SME CEO’s Issue Leadership and SME Performance, Korea Business Journal, 29(2), 195-212
    15. Han, H. J., & Yoon, S. M. (2011). A Study on the Influence of Corporate Culture on Financial Performance: Focusing on Hotel Corporate Culture and Perceived Performance. Hotel Management Research, 20(1), 267-284.
    16. Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (1986). Relationships among corporate level distinctive competencies, diversification strategy, corporate structure and performance. Journal of management studies, 23(4), 401-416.
    17. Jeon, J. Y. (2011). A Study on the Effects of Family Restaurant`s Core Competency on the Organizational Effectiveness. Ph.D Dissertation, King Sejong University.
    18. Jung, D. Y. (2008). The Hierarchical Linear Relationship among Career Commitment, Individual Characteristics and Organizational Characteristics of High School Graduate Early Careers in Small and Medium Enterprises. Ph. D. Dissertation. Education in the Graduate School, Seoul National University.
    19. Jung, D. Y., & Eom, T. Y. (2010). A Study on the Effects of First Mover Advantage and Competitive Advantage on Firm Performance in the Franchise Industry. Korea Business Administration Society, Working Paper, 1-19.
    20. Jung, D. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2008). The Effects of Core Competence and Networking on Firm Performance - Comparative study between Korea and China SMEs. Journal of the Korean Entrepreneurship Society, 3(2), 43-69.
    21. Jung, D. Y., & Yang, C. H. (2009). An Empirical and Comparative Study of Modeling the Relationship between Networking and Perceived Firm Performance of SMEs of Korea and China. International Business Review, 13(2), 27-56.
    22. Kang, S. M., & Lee, H. T. (2012). A Study on the Effects of Entrepreneurship and Core Competencies on Firm Performance. Journal of Marketing Studies, 20(1), 1–16.
    23. Kim, E. H. (2002). Competition Strategy based on the Management Resource Theory, Koreanische Zeitschrift fuer Wirtschaftswissenschaften, 20(2): 65-82.
    24. Kwan, K. H. (2006). Conceptual evolution within the modern resource-based view: An assessment and review. Korea Business Review, 9(2), 215-244.
    25. Kwan, Y. C. (2010). Dynamic Capabilities of Multinational Subsidiaries: Determinants and Performance. Management Review, 39(5), 1151-1175.
    26. Kwon O. I., & Lee, G. D. (2007). Exploratory consideration of the relationship between small and medium-sized businesses, CEOs, Strategies, HRM, and the impact of consistency on performance, Conference of Korea integrated academic publication Proceedings, 1-19,
    27. Kim, C. G. (2005). Core Competences for Sustaining Competitive Advantage. Community Development Review, 5(1), 265-278.
    28. Kim, M. K. (2002). A Study on the Determinants of Leverage in Unlisted Small and Medium Enterprises. The Korean journal of financial management, 19(1), 33-66.
    29. Lee, J. H., & Kim, Y. U. (2003). Effects of Technological Capability, Owners` Characteristics, and Organizational Structures on Financial Performance. Small and Medium Business Research, 25(4), 79-111.
    30. Lucia, A. D., & Lepsinger, R. (1999). The art and science of competency models: Pinpointing critical success factors in organizations. New York, NY: Pfeiffer.
    31. Mahoney, J. T. (1995). The management of resources and the resource of management. Journal of business research, 33(2), 91-101.
    32. Makadok, R. (2001). Toward a Synthesis of the Resources-Based and Dynamic-Capability Views of Rent Creation. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 387-401.
    33. Nam, O. J., & Lee, C. S. (2009). The Mediating Effect of Management Strategy on the Relationship of Internal Marketing and Performance of Hotel Corporations. Hotel Management Research, 18(3), 99-118.
    34. Noh, H. J. (2012). A Study on the Effect of Core Competencies and Value Innovation Strategies on Business Performance in the Manufacturing Industries. Korea Computer Information Society Journal, 17(4), 155-161.
    35. Park, C. M. (2005). The Impact of the Firm Performance on the SMEs CEO Characteristics in Yeongnam Area, Industrial and Economic Studies, 18(3), 1075-1101.
    36. Park, G. S., Choi, S. C., & Park, H. B. (2008). The study on the strategic resource effect on performance measure and firm’s performance. Journal of Tax and Accounting, 22, 75-94.
    37. Park, J. H., Hur, J., & Keum, S. B. (2011). A Study on Management Performance of Food Manufactory Companies for Traceability System. Food Management Research, 14(1), 47-65.
    38. Park, S. H., Cho, N. J., & Kang, T. G. (2004). The Effect of Competitive Strategy and Information Intensity on the Usage of Information & Communication Technology. Journal of Korea Industrial Economics, 17(4), 1485-1508.
    39. Park, S. Y., & Lee, C. (2011). Development of a Competency Model for CEO in SMEs. Journal of agricultural education and human resource development, 43(1), 87-106.
    40. Park, W. S. (2002). Human Resource Management by Capabilities. Working Paper, Korea Labor Research Institute.
    41. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.
    42. Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
    43. Seo, K. H. & Lee, S. B. (2011). The Effect of Corporate Image on the Service Quality, Fitness of Extension Brand and Attitude: Focus on Food Service Corporate. Journal of Korea Food and Cooking, 20(59), 69-92.
    44. Seo, K. H., & Lee, S. B. (2012). The Effect of Managerial Resources of Food Service Enterprises on Competition Strategy and Business Performance. Tourism Research Journal, 26(2), 279-296.
    45. Shin, J. K. (2008). The Organizational Characteristics And Technology Commercialization Of SMEs - Moderating Effects Of Internal Integration And External Network -. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 15(2), 159-175.
    46. Son, E. H., & Kim, K. H. (2007). Effects of the Alignment between Core Competence and competitive Strategy on the Business Performance in the Hotel Industry. Journal of Hotel Management, 16(4), 93-111.
    47. Son E. H., & Kim, K. H. (2007). Effects of the Alignment between Core Competence and Competitive Strategy on the Business Performance in the Hotel Industry. Hotel Management Review, 16(5), 93-111.
    48. Teece, D. J., Gary Pisano, & Amy Shuen. (1997). Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509-533.
    49. Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 801-814.
    50. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource‐based view of the firm. Strategic management journal, 5(2), 171-180.